(continued from p.1)
5. Tension: identity vs.
role confusion (virtue = “fidelity”) … the big adolescent tension, who am I?
But, don’t we all continue to be confronted throughout life with choices of
roles – me vs. not me? The literature in the sixties often spoke of
gender orientation as a good example of a crisis which could cause a fall back
to an earlier stage, unable to successfully resolve a “nonconforming” gender/sexual
orientation due to social pressure. That’s less of an issue today, but perhaps
not totally absent, yet, in certain segments of society. But, don’t we often
have demands placed upon us, by some compelling authority, which simply DO NOT
FIT who we feel we are. If that leads to job change, there could be a snowball
effect with livelihood, family, community, etc. … all leading to a throwback to
an earlier stage. I believe I had such an experience with teaching, in my
youthful exuberance after college, which led to my moving to the DC area, and back
to Stage 3 or 4.
6. Tension: intimacy vs.
isolation (virtue = “love”) … ahhh, the memories! The loneliness of late
adolescence (i.e., the horniness!). I’m sure I don’t need to say anything more
about this tension to any divorced, or widowed, adult! Loss of an intimate
partner can surely propel one backwards to an earlier, more comfortable,
resolved, stage of development – stage 5, at least! Fortunately, I have not had
such an experience (yet), but I can imagine the devastation I would feel at the
loss of my wife of 34 years.
7. Tension: generativity
vs. stagnation (virtue = “care”) … those of us who think we’ve successfully
resolved this tension, know that it (and all the previous stages) must have
resolution before achieving the final virtue of “wisdom”. We know about the
pandemic of “career burnout”, taking away the sense of achievement in your
career. That even had an impact on my own retirement decision, when I felt I
had done all the damage I could to the institution! But, then I found that I
had to establish new “retirement competencies” (Stage 4?), like writing a blog!
And, isn’t failure to secure “caring” one of the leading causes of divorce
(i.e., stagnation)?
8. Tension: ego integrity
vs. despair (virtue = “wisdom”) … yes, here we are, today. Despair is also
described in some of Erikson’s writing as “disgust”: that is, self-disgust. The central question is
really: have I been a good person? I Can’t
help but wonder where our President is in this stage of psychosocial
development, now … also, isn’t intellectual honesty part of the picture? Do I really
believe what I say, or write? Readers may speculate …
I only discovered in researching Erikson’s eight stages
that, shortly before her death twenty years ago, at age 93, Joan Erikson
published an article which postulated a ninth
stage of psychosocial development, she characterized it as something which
happens mostly to people who live as long as she, and it encapsulates all
previous eight stages, but inverted … unwinding, as it were! Until, ultimately,
one is left with Distrust vs. Trust … when you realize that, in the end, you
are clearly alone and abandoned! Perhaps religious beliefs may help to
counteract this realization, at least historically: discussion, debate?
Erikson’s influence has grown since the 1960s, until now,
when the “Eight Stages …” are fundamental
components of any understanding of
developmental psychology. Like many psychosocial theories, Erikson’s has
both supporters and detractors. He acknowledged that his theory was more
descriptive than predictive, certainly not prescriptive, but it still stands on
its own as a beautifully balanced portrait of an idealized lifespan, truly
elegant in its structure, and its language. He uses the term “epigenesis”
to describe his theory, “beyond genetics”. The critics tend to focus on his
lack of prescriptive therapeutic practice. But, to this student, at least, the
expansion beyond Freud’s emphasis on the id is seminal. It allows us to see
psychosocial development as a life-long process, not something which is
completed in adolescence -- Freud’s “genital” stage of development. Although,
Erikson’s entry point was adolescent psychology (hence, my early fascination?),
it is the life-encompassing nature of the theory that generates its “poetic
elegance.”
No comments:
Post a Comment