Face-to-Face with Disability Awareness
William Sundwick
We knew about her disability. We had hosted her in our home
once before, three years ago, for a different event in Washington. But this
time was different. Activism was her primary motive. The earlier event had been
about religious advocacy in a more general sense. This time we shared her
outrage and planned on participating in the “March for Our Lives,” anyway.
My primary mood preceding her arrival from Ottawa was that although
we had an obligation to her (i.e., sympathy for her plight), I dreaded having
to deal with her multiple disabilities for a whole week! She uses a walker due
to balance issues, is hard of hearing with aids that are only partially effective,
and near-sighted without a proper prescription for eyeglasses – apparently, even
the Canadian health care system can’t help the poor and disabled enough. Also,
swallowing and denture issues prevent her from eating many of the foods that
are a staple in our household (not to mention restaurants).
Is it her poverty that’s the key to her difficulty? Perhaps --
even in Canada.
Most of the resources on Turner
Syndrome emphasize that early identification (even prenatal) is best for
what may be prolonged ERT (Estrogen Replacement Therapy). That’s the first
thing that jumps out when you read the descriptions
of the genetic abnormality. But our Canadian friend was not diagnosed until her
teen years, when she failed to menstruate. Her symptoms nevertheless were
manageable, once she accepted her likely infertility. She became a nanny and
married an American.
Only as she approached middle age did things start to
unravel. The 10 per cent hearing loss climbed over a few years to a 50 per cent
loss. Brittle bones and balance issues caused increasing danger for falls –
she’s used a walker since her mid-forties. When she flies, she requests
wheelchair accommodation. She looks for ramps and cuts in the curb when walking
on the street. Our house has none of that. Closed captions on TV help her
immensely, and she can’t use voice communication on her phone. She also needs a
Blackberry with actual keys, can’t use the touchscreens of typical smart phones
and tablets. At the Dulles ticket counter, she had trouble reading even the
large signs over the airline desks.
Her American husband died from a massive stroke in 2005. He
had suffered cardiovascular problems since he was tortured as a Vietnam
prisoner of war. Lobbying Congress was on her agenda while in Washington. She
cares about torture (her Facebook page: “Torture Is Always Wrong”). She
hand-delivered a one-page letter to each Senator’s office (all 100, both
parties) condemning the nomination of Gina
Haspel as Director of Central Intelligence. Despite them being in recess,
she was pleased by the reaction she received in the three Senate Office
Buildings. She also gave an enthusiastic thumbs-up to her visit with the
Dept. of Veterans Affairs. She’s confident that, after applying in person, she
will be seeing survivor benefits soon.
Her hand-painted sign for the March read “Canadians Stand
with U.S. Children.” It was painted on a pillowcase by a friend. She claims
that even in childhood she was outspoken – “listen to me!” “I’m special!” – she
thanks her parents for much of her activism. The Turner diagnosis simply gave
her more of a focus. Her husband’s struggle added to it. Now, she is convinced
that she does matter – she can do
much, she can instruct, she can share her strength and her resolve. She can
create her own platform by shouting at demonstrations and writing angry emails.
Her message, delivered wherever she can get a platform, consists mostly of:
“there are many of us,” and “let me be your voice” – our rights are no fewer
than others’ – and, we are eager to form alliances with other marginalized
groups. We need to be “in your face” more, not less!
It is a powerful message. Those of us with privilege are
forced to contemplate what it’s like to not be taken seriously. The
implications for intersectionality cannot be missed. It really is about the
blindness of privilege. We should all be called. There is no ambiguity in this
message. We all need to seek affiliation with organizations that promote the
marginalized -- whether churches, political party, charitable organizations, or
street protests.
The marginalized include children who are potential victims
of gun violence.
The marginalized include veterans who have been victims,
beyond their understanding, of the horrors of war.
The marginalized include people who suffer the effects of
rare genetic abnormalities that come to rule their lives.
When the privileged
start noticing the marginalized, that’s a beginning. Next comes analysis. What
accommodations are needed for the marginalized group? Who are the decision
makers? What can be done to affect the power relations between the marginalized
group and the decision makers? The Disabled need to tell the Able-bodied what
they need. Others need to tell the powerful and privileged what they require,
as well.
While it may feel good for the privileged to claim they
sympathize (even empathize) with the marginalized, little is accomplished
without action. Power analysis and direct confrontation – whether in the
streets or at the polls, or both – is what will bring action. At the March,
hundreds of thousands shouted in unison, “vote them out!”
In the meantime, those of us who must force ourselves to pay
attention, because it is so unpleasant to be aware of the marginalized, can
listen. We can reflect on our own precarious privilege. I sometimes wonder how
long I have before my mental acuity starts to slip – already, I am rattled when
my daily routines are interrupted for a week by the visit of a disabled house
guest -- I lost the nighttime use of my office, since it is in the only first
floor room with a sofa bed (Quelle
horreur!).
Yes, I am listening … yes, the struggle continues. It’s not
easy to listen.
((Bill)) Thanks very much. It's great :) Thank you and Gail everything during our week together :) I am truly grateful :)
ReplyDelete